Compound interest is boring!

Compound interest is boring exhibits satisfiability. ~ Exvirgin, 2010

And all of a Sudan it returns

Aren’t I wonderful?

In the approximate period I’ve been gone, the following searches have linked here:

Search Views
crimean war 16
andropov 12
“empire goodness” russian movie 10
aeroplane 7
“analytical wiki 5
crimean war pictures 3
explain the history of compound interest 3
ayatollah 2
happy birthday to you baboons 2
baboons stealing 2
andropov photo 2
cambodia gay 2
emperor napoleon 2
khomeini sean canry 2
mussolini glabal warming 2
crimean war charge of the light brigade 2
hitler moustache 2
mussolini with pope 2
piano sayings 2
crimean war jokes 2
anglo-american relations improve 2
gordon brown 2
comics.aha.ru 2
prince leka albania 2
rus comics 2
khrushchev mad 1
connery,gay 1
sonia gandhi mussolini 1
all images of richard nixon 1
crimean jokes 1
crossdresser doing housework 1
portraits of kruschev 1
presidents of the united states with gla 1
richard nixon piano 1
boring north korea 1
crossdresser parties in england 1
partido revolucionário institucional 1
welcome 1
the triforce of dinner 1
awesome moustache 1
cambodia’s king and queen 1
crossdresser nate 1
nixon in peru 1
mussolini and kim jung-il 1
compound interest poem 1
one legged cowboy 1
wordpress compound interest 1
analytical wiki 1
pictures of angry baboons 1
hitler and stalin 1

Isn’t that most exciting?

Search Views
crimean war 16
andropov 12
“empire goodness” russian movie 10
aeroplane 7
“analytical wiki 5
crimean war pictures 3
explain the history of compound interest 3
ayatollah 2
happy birthday to you baboons 2
baboons stealing 2
andropov photo 2
cambodia gay 2
emperor napoleon 2
khomeini sean canry 2
mussolini glabal warming 2
crimean war charge of the light brigade 2
hitler moustache 2
mussolini with pope 2
piano sayings 2
crimean war jokes 2
anglo-american relations improve 2
gordon brown 2
comics.aha.ru 2
prince leka albania 2
rus comics 2
khrushchev mad 1
connery,gay 1
sonia gandhi mussolini 1
all images of richard nixon 1
crimean jokes 1
crossdresser doing housework 1
portraits of kruschev 1
presidents of the united states with gla 1
richard nixon piano 1
boring north korea 1
crossdresser parties in england 1
partido revolucionário institucional 1
welcome 1
the triforce of dinner 1
awesome moustache 1
cambodia’s king and queen 1
crossdresser nate 1
nixon in peru 1
mussolini and kim jung-il 1
compound interest poem 1
one legged cowboy 1
wordpress compound interest 1
analytical wiki 1
pictures of angry baboons 1
hitler and stalin 1
Advertisement

August 17, 2010 - Posted by | From the management, Generic Ramblings, Idiocy, Political | , , , ,

8 Comments »

  1. You have returned!

    Don’t ever leave us again!

    Comment by A Bad Satanist | August 17, 2010 | Reply

  2. I kissed him, as commanded, but my wish hasn’t come true yet. He must have been an imposter.

    Comment by A Bad Satanist | August 24, 2010 | Reply

  3. Welcome back,
    I hope things move around you nicely.

    Still, I haven’t given up the analytical wiki business. I request you to have a critical look at http://analytical.wikia.com

    Now it is more scientific, I hope. I wish you to help me in improving the language. Help me in the noble cause of taking ‘scientific questions to scientific thinkers’.

    Comment by Sivashanmugam | September 2, 2010 | Reply

  4. Welcome back sir,
    I hope things move around you nicely.

    Still, I haven’t given up the analytical wiki business. I request you to have a critical look at http://analytical.wikia.com

    Now it is more scientific, I hope. I wish you to help me in improving the language. Help me in the noble cause of taking ‘scientific questions to scientific thinkers’.

    Comment by Sivashanmugam | September 2, 2010 | Reply

  5. 1. The laws of nature are the properties of one and all.
    2. Has science disproved that all are under the same laws of nature?

    Comment by Sivashanmugam | September 10, 2010 | Reply

  6. Do you agree that one should agree with the modern professional scientific intellects even if it is a lie?

    According to modern Professional Scientific Intellects:
    1. Science never searches for divisibility.
    2. Science never searches for comparability.
    3. Science never searches for connectivity.
    4. Science never searches for sensitivity.
    5. Science never searches for transformability.
    6. Science never searches for substitutability.
    7. Science never searches for satisfiability.

    One should agree with these statements. Else, you would be branded as maniac! Am I right?

    Doesn’t science search, find and teach you about divisibility of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? Doesn’t mathematics teach you that everything is perfectly divisible by unity?

    Doesn’t science search, find and teach you about comparability of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? Doesn’t science teach you the methods of comparing and contrasting things?

    Doesn’t science search, find and teach you about connectivity of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? Anything which cannot be connected to your mind cannot be thought.

    Doesn’t science search, find and teach you about sensitivity of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? How can one assay the cause-effect if no thing has sensitivity?

    Doesn’t science search, find and teach you about transformability of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? Hasn’t science taught transformations of energy, matter, equations, sentences?

    Doesn’t science search, find and teach you about substitutability of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? No computer can be at work if does not have searched for substitutability. What is going to be in the place of what is present now? What is evolution?

    Doesn’t science search, find and teach you about the conditions which could be satisfied (satisfiability) by atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities?

    What would your knowledge be if no thing has divisibility, comparability, connectivity, sensitivity, transformability, substitutability and satisfiability?

    Comment by Sivashanmugam | October 21, 2010 | Reply

  7. You will find them
    everywhere in everything

    If you search for divisibility,
    you will find it
    everywhere in everything!

    If you search for comparability,
    you will find it
    everywhere in everything!

    If you search for connectivity,
    you will find it
    everywhere in everything!

    If you search for sensitivity,
    you will find it
    everywhere in everything!

    If you search for transformability,
    you will find it
    everywhere in everything!

    If you search for substitutability,
    you will find it
    everywhere in everything!

    If you search for satisfiability,
    you will find it
    everywhere in everything!

    Doesn’t science search and study divisibility?
    Yes, science searches for it
    everywhere in everything!

    Doesn’t science search and study comparability?
    Yes, science searches for it
    everywhere in everything!

    Doesn’t science search and study connectivity?
    Yes, science searches for it
    everywhere in everything!

    Doesn’t science search and study sensitivity?
    Yes, science searches for it
    everywhere in everything!

    Doesn’t science search and study transformability?
    Yes, science searches for it
    everywhere in everything!

    Doesn’t science search and study substitutability?
    Yes, science searches for it
    everywhere in everything!

    Doesn’t science search and study satisfiability?
    Yes, science searches for it
    everywhere in everything!

    What will you do
    if nothing has divisibility,
    comparability, connectivity, sensitivity,
    transformability, substitutability, and statisfiability?

    What would your knowledge be
    if nothing has divisibility,
    comparability, connectivity, sensitivity,
    transformability, substitutability, and statisfiability?

    - Sivashanmugam. P.,
    Jamal Mohamed College

    Comment by Sivashanmugam | October 30, 2010 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.