The American Revolution was caused by British Colonisation of Mars
Many think that taxes caused the American Revolution, this is the case, but the British Claims, widely accepted, that taxes were for the maintenance of the defense of the American Colonies is outright piffle.
Why? You ask? Because the British had Colonies on Mars! It sounds ridiculous, but Canals can be seen on Mars, and what country was the most prolific builder of Canals? The English. And the English used their ridiculously high and obviously unjust taxes on Patriotic and Innocent Americans to fund their ridiculous Martian Project. What other reasons could there be? The British managed to hide this for over 130 years, but the faithful and noble Giovanni Schiaparelli was on the verge of discovering this, when he was crudely murdered by MI5. This cannot be doubted. He died on the Fourth of July 1910, and King Edward VII died on May 6th 1910. If we add the Day and Months together, both equal the number of 11! A coincidence? I think not!
Now, where does the Maori Party fit into this puzzle of interplanetary colonial intrigue. Well, after the British efforts to fund the Colonisation of Mars collapsed, they had to find a place to put the Colonists. And where better than the not yet colonised land of New Zealand, as the Maoris?
Compound interest is boring! 
I would imagine a similar scheme was tried on Kangaroo Island. How would you explain the complete lack of natives there, though?
Do you think Giovanni Schiaparelli is taller or shorter than Jimmy Wales? What about Benito Mussolini?
In response to your first question, where do you think the damned Kangaroos came from? South America?
And of course Schiaparelli is taller. His name is longer, for starters.
Any property which can be found in more than one thing is a common property. Any property which cannot be found in more than one thing is a special property.
The knowledge of the common properties can be applied on more than one thing because a common property can be found in more than one thing. The knowledge of a special property cannot be applied on more than one thing because a special property cannot be found in more than one thing.
Everyone who has the knowledge of common properties will know how to systematically initiate studies on things which are yet to be studied. Everyone who does not have the knowledge of common properties will not know how to systematically initiate studies on things which are yet to be studied.
Everyone who has the knowledge of common properties can illustrate students how the knowledge of common properties can be applied to initiate studies on things which are yet to be studied.
Everyone who does not have the knowledge of common properties cannot illustrate students how the knowledge of common properties can be applied to initiate studies on things which are yet to be studied.
How can the people who proclaim that students have no need to study and list the common properties of things teach students how to systematically initiate studies on things which are yet to be studied?
In response to your inquiry:
Perhaps it is because of the convergence of the White and Blue Niles, at Khartoum, that students can be taught how to systematically initiate studies on things which are yet to be studied. Or perhaps other reasons, like the Second Opium War? Or the First Anglo-Afghan War? Or General Elphinstone’s incompetence and stupidity?
All are equally valid reasons.